Subject	The Z doesn't have variable valve timing does it? I didn't
Posted by	BadZCar (FL) on May 30, 2001 at 8:51 PM
	This message has been viewed 18 times.
In Reply To	help me interpret the torque curve... posted by Technomancer on May 30, 2001 at 08:43 PM
Message	think it did, I might be very wrong. I would interpret it as map changes but again, I may be very wrong. I know if you look at dynos with the wolf programming you can see similiar patterns and it has been called infamous, or is that the a/f ratio.. Damn, I'm braindead tonight. --==**>>IZCC#204<<**==-- HP is like crack, once you get a taste of it, you will follow the glass tailpipe to the bitter end.
Follow Ups	my dyno results (nearly stock Z) - Technomancer 20:10:54 05/30/01 Sounds right, 300hp - 15% Loss. Your about right there. (n/m) - BadZCar (FL) 20:18:47 05/30/01 I guess I'm used to hearing 20% losses - Technomancer 20:22:56 05/30/01 SAE is 15-18%, Stealths are like 34%. I find that my - BadZCar (FL) 20:32:51 05/30/01 I saw SactoTodd dyno at 264 RWHP stock - Ste?myZ(ZtoyZ.NET©) 20:31:35 05/30/01 YO Steve, when you gonna quote my interior bud? :) - BadZCar (FL) 20:34:08 05/30/01 Yea...real dam busy... - Ste?myZ(ZtoyZ.NET©) 20:53:38 05/30/01 close - SactoTodd 01:39:31 05/31/01 Ah, so we got pretty much the same numbers - Technomancer 13:51:16 05/31/01 help me interpret the torque curve... - Technomancer 20:43:43 05/30/01 The Z doesn't have variable valve timing does it? I didn't - BadZCar (FL) 20:51:52 05/30/01 we have variable valve timing but not cam changing - Technomancer 21:01:52 05/30/01 exception: no timing change in 96 version, it was discontin. (n/m) - Technomancer 21:02:58 05/30/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.